With the Details Enhancer method, the setting Highlights Smoothing(under the S/H tab) is useful for reducing halos around objects placed against bright backgrounds.
Photomatix essentials free free#
The simplest and most effective one is to use the Tone Compressor method for tone mapping your image, as this method is free from halo artifacts. › How do I reduce/eliminate "halo" effects with tone mapping? There are several ways to achieve that. Here's the relevant section from the FAQ: Sometimes simpler tools are better for many people because they remove choices and make it easier to do what the tool maker thinks are the common cases. I'm just trying to dispel the myth that there's a single Photomatix "HDR look", when there are a huge number of options that can achieve results all over the map.
You should use the tools that work best for you. You can get as natural as you like.īTW, I'm not trying to change your mind. If you want a natural look, I would recommend using either the pure exposure blending option, or the HDR tone-compressor exposure blending mode. These are actually quite complicated tools which one can not evaluate without spending a lot of time with them. Likewise, Tone Compressor mode provides global tone mapping corrections that produce much more realstic results than does Details Enhancer which does the fine-detail contrast enhancements that give it the HDR look. It's in fact incapable of producing any HDR look, because all it's doing is preventing clipping by pixel selection. It does make for a more dramatic photo but I'm after more natural.ĭid you use Photomatix Exposure/Blend or HDR Mode? Tone Mapping Details Enhancer, or Tone Compressor modes? Those different options produce drastically different results. It may not be as apparent here in my post but when I viewed the two images fullscreen and flipped back & forth between the two, I noticed the softness/dreamyness/halo in a number of areas. Anyways, I just wanted to post some examples from both programs for the benefit of others. I have not had an opportunity to work with a bracketed set of images yet but hope to do so after this weekend.
Photomatix essentials free series#
The foreground seems more balanced exposure wise and the valley immediately across from me in the lower left doesn't look like a series of water spots on the lens like the Photomatix HDR version. As advertised, there are no halo effects in the image. I prefer the Essential HDR output MUCH more. Here's the result using their "Detail Revealer" dialog: Using Essential HDR, I tried to produce an image which was similar to the Photomatix output. I wasn't sure what other HDR programs to consider but after some digging, I decided to try Essential HDR. I did like the results although it had some of that "dreamy" (or halo effect) that is typical of Photomatix HDRs. Next is the result from Photomatix using Tone Mapping: First up, here's my "best" attempt with just curve adjustments to the RAW file: Unfortunately, I didn't have a proper sequence of bracketed photos to work with so I made three exposures from the source RAW file (-2, 0, +2). I decided to try it out so the question then becomes which program to use- Photomatix or ?. I've been hesitant about it since I feel that most HDR photos don't appear realistic.
Anyways, some folks suggested HDR processing as an alternative. For the benefit of others searching the forum, I thought I'd post this.Ībout a month ago, I posted some photos from a hike up into the snow where I had some real challenges due to a large dynamic range.
0 kommentar(er)
